Lauren London commemorated Nipsey Hussle with ink after giving a tearful speech at his memorial service.
The actress posted a photo of her newly tattoed arm on Instagram with a caption reading: “Real Love Never Dies,” followed by the epiphany, “When you see me, you will always see him #LoveYouHussle #TMC”
The portrait shows Hussle’s face along with the text “God will rise,” which he had tattooed on his face next to his right eye.
Thousands gathered for the late rap star’s public memorial service Thursday (April 11), where London shared a text message she’d once sent to Hussle and remembered him as a loving father and boyfriend.
[apple_news_ad type=”standard”]
Nice I send positive energy to the family
Silly Bitch! Half of the celebrities that were willing to give her a contract just dropped out. Dumb ass bitch!
Betcha she gets it removed.
You’re a succa.
agreed. when youre a model/actor…you dont fuck up your skin with tattoos like that.
I would so do her in the ass.
Go right ahead, Craig. Lil Weezy already loosened that booty hole up for you. She’s been around the hood block.
20 years ago we mourned in peace. Game couldnt be the only one to get a tat.
Game tatted for clout.
This Lauren London girl has a pretty face, but is ratchet as hell.
I wonder if Nipsey’s family are gonna cut her a check? She’s not his wife she’s not legally obligated to his money. All the royalties and masters aren’t going to this girl. Her son might be entitled to a percentage but if the family does her dirty she might not have a place to live soon that house she lives in won’t go to her. The other baby mommas will want an equal slice if she’s given part of the inheritance. This kids is why you have kids in the security of marriage, it secures generational wealth and ensures equitable inheritance among your kin and offspring.
Actually, being married doesn’t entitle you to shit either. It’s interesting that so many are not aware of this. Whether she gets the house would have to do with the deed when it was bought. Has shit to do with being married. The only protection that would have brought her is preventing the house to be sold in estate to pay off any debts he had that his assets won’t cover. As far as his assets, Cali is not a community property state, so no, being married or actually just being common law married which those states recognize would constitute the same doesn’t matter. If he didn’t leave a will, married or not, estate law for Cali will split the money up among all of his heirs. Instead of trying to chastise her about her decisions, you might want to brush up on your own assets and who gets them when you die since you seem quite misinformed on the topic. Just sprinkling game since most don’t know.
That’s inherently false, state laws vary so maybe what you’re describing is possible in other states but in most states when you married in community of property there is no that’s his and that’s mine, all the husbands money goes to his spouse if he doesn’t have a will. She also inherits all debts and responsibilty to fulfill all pre-established legal obligation the husband might have committed to. If you were familiar with inheritance law you know that it is extremely biased towards a legally recognised spouse because while that person was alive it was already assumed that his money is your money (if the parties were married in community of property).
Community property doesn’t mean shit in relation to the house and who gets it. That’s designated when you buy your house on the deed. Whether you’re married or not, there is a little thing on there that you have to check to say there will be another person on the deed, spouse or not. If they didn’t buy that house together, she would have been in this same situation regardless if he died with no will because probate court will split the assets up among all of his heirs, which she has two of. Furthermore, the thing that marriage would have done was put her solely on the hook for all of his debts and not the estate. So instead of any creditors being paid out of his assets, they could go after hers.
An estate in legal terms doesn’t mean a house only? Omg what law school did you go to? An estate is the total amount of an individual’s assets-debts. What the hell do you mean marriage has no effect on who gets the house? The house is part of his estate. His share (assuming he is not the sole owner of his house) of the house is classified as part if his estate. In community of property what’s yours is mine. So yeah his wife would be entitled to the house, becuase legally speaking it’s also her house which is why if they divorce she can take the house or at the very least they sell the house and divide the proceeds (this applies even if the man bought the house and put it in his name) the marriage laws precede property laws when it comes to community of property. The only to get around that is if the guy buys the house and puts it under his mothers name or something like that. But otherwise anything he owns goes to the spouse before anyone else.
People watch too many movies where somebody dies and the wife or somebody inherits everything, lol. In the real world kids, it hardly works like that. Uncle Sam fucks you while you’re here, and they fuck your heirs when you’re gone. They even lock all of your accounts if you didn’t designate a payable on death benefit when you were setting it up. Then, that gets split among all the heirs after creditors are paid. So again, you might want to check up on your own before trying to sound smart about something you seem to have no clue about since being married wouldn’t entitle her to anything more than she’ll get when it’s split up to her kids with him. Even a will in many cases isn’t foolproof to say who will get what.
she has 8 million dollars to her name bardi retardi, he only had 5. your very low iq
just sayin ur dumb
Uh Lauren London is a rich actress she can a house on her own probably already owns one!
Now as far is what his son/ they’re child is entitled to is different story altogether
.that can get sticky if he didn’t have a living will