Lizzo Lawsuit On Hold While She Appeals Judge’s Ruling About Dismissal

    Lizzo can breathe a sigh of relief, since a sexual harassment lawsuit brought against her by her former backup dancers has temporarily been put on pause.

    Court documents obtained by Billboard reveal that Judge Mark Epstein ordered the case to be stayed as of Thursday (March 7), as Lizzo’s attorneys appeal a ruling against having it thrown out.

    Epstein denied Lizzo’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that the suit violated California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws, which prevent people and corporations from filing frivolous lawsuits to stifle free speech.

    It is expected to take several months for the appeals process to conclude.

    Earlier this month, Epstein denied the singer’s motion to throw out her sexual harassment lawsuit filed by three of her former backup dancers Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams, and Noelle Rodriguez.

    It’s important to note that while certain accusations have been dismissed — such as claims that Lizzo fat-shamed one of her dancers — the case as a whole will go to trial.

    “It is dangerous for the court to weigh in, ham-fisted, into constitutionally protected activity,” the judge wrote. “But it is equally dangerous to turn a blind eye to allegations of discrimination or other forms of misconduct merely because they take place in a speech-related environment,” Epstein wrote in his decision.

    The judge’s decision echoes a November opposition filing submitted by the dancer’s legal team, contending that the anti-SLAPP statutes do not shield Lizzo from potential legal consequences for the allegations made against her.

    They wrote in the 19-page filing obtained by Rolling Stone: “Can a global celebrity be forever insulated from civil liability because all their conduct is protected as free speech under the anti-SLAPP statute? Defendant Lizzo asks this Court to rule in exactly that fashion. Fortunately for all victims of celebrity malfeasance, the law says otherwise.”

    They added: “In an apparent effort to dupe this Court, Defendants either cherry-pick allegations or outright omit allegations inconvenient to their position, instead sanitizing them with euphemisms.”

    The lawsuit — which names Lizzo, her production company, Big Grrrl Big Touring, and her dance captain, Shirlene Quigley as defendants — was filed last August.

    10 thoughts on “Lizzo Lawsuit On Hold While She Appeals Judge’s Ruling About Dismissal

    1. Am I the only one who’s seriously infatuated with and thinking about Lizzo’s anus every day?

      1. Stop with all this gay shit y’all keep posting on here. Okay we get it, you like big hairy fat men. We don’t care just keep it to yourself.

      2. ??? Lizzo is a girl, I’m a dude. What part of that is gay? You must be fucking those chicks with dicks, huh ? It’s ok bro, be proud of who you are 🌈

      3. Lizzo is not a woman, she’s pretty much a fat guy. You could have any woman in the world and you pick 2 tons of no fun. Also no straight man would brag about eating or licking asshole. That’s only the gays that.

      4. Hey, I’m into big girls, what can I say? When you were born, your mother shit you out of her asshole… does that make her “gay” too? You really should stop letting all those trannies fucking you though.. you need Jesus in your life

      5. Only tranny banger and homos think about licking anus and are obsessed with assholes. Besides we all know you haven’t had pussy since your transgender dad shot you out of there’s. How can you say that I need Jesus when you’re the fruitcake here. Nobody likes fat girls unless you’re either a loser or hiding the fact that you’re gay and need them as proof to convince everyone else that prison hasn’t turn you out.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *