Teyana Taylor has reportedly finalized her divorce from Iman Shumpert, and will receive a seven-figure payout in the settlement.
According to documents obtained by The Jasmine Brand on Monday (June 24), the divorce was made official in Fulton County, Georgia.
AD LOADING...
The ruling states that Teyana will retain four of their marital properties, which have an an estimated value of over $10 million. She will also keep all of her jewelry and a collection of vehicles including a Maybach, a Mercedes Sprinter, a tour bus and her Bronco truck. In addition, she will continue to have 100% ownership of her companies, Taylormade and Auntie’s.
Shumpert will keep his Miami condo and two compounds in Georgia, as well as all of his Shumpert Shump investments. However, he was also ordered to make a one time seven-figure payment to his ex, along with $8k per month in child support. He must also cover the full tuition for both of their daughters’ private schools.
AD LOADING...
Teyana Taylor filed for divorce in January 2023, long before the former couple announced their separation in September.
In the divorce filing, Taylor also asked for primary custody of their children as well as joint legal custody and child support, and accused Shumpert of “treating her cruelly and displaying extreme narcissistic behavior throughout the majority of their marriage.”
She also accused the former New York Knicks player of “being extremely emotionally and mentally abusive towards her,” adding that he could be prone to exhibiting “cruel behavior and selfishness.”
Her filing also claims Shumpert cheated on her multiple times during their relationship, contrary to her previous statement that “infidelity ain’t one of the reasons for our departure.”
AD LOADING...
Taylor’s petition for divorce also includes details such as Shumpert crashing her Rolls-Royce and fleeing the scene to avoid arrest, displaying jealous behavior whenever she was in the spotlight, and asking her not to work.
In his response, Iman Shumpert denied the claims and said that Teyana lacked proof of her assertions.
